The Weber County Hive
August 2026
Land Use & State Authorities

The Foundation

Every tax MIDA now levies inside its own project-area PIDs traces back to one 2021 bill — the one that also carved out a conflict-of-interest exception and shielded MIDA from open meetings and records law, years before anyone was watching.

Sources: le.utah.gov, LegiScan Method: Public records only, no comment requested

Start Here — the 60-second version

New to this story? Click to open a plain-language walkthrough.
+
  1. 1
    S.B. 233 (2021) is the bill that let a Public Infrastructure District created by MIDA levy property tax directly — the mechanism behind every MIDA-area tax bill documented since.
  2. 2
    It's part of a two-step sequence: S.B. 179 (2020, sponsored by a different senator, Daniel McCay) first let MIDA create these PIDs at all. S.B. 233, a year later, gave those PIDs the power to tax.
  3. 3
    The same bill also carved out a conflict-of-interest exception for contracts involving MIDA or a subsidiary as a public-private partnership facilitator, and wrote in exceptions to Utah's open meetings and government records laws.
  4. 4
    Sponsor: Sen. Jerry W. Stevenson, MIDA's own Vice Chair — the same senator/floor-sponsor pair (Stevenson/Val Peterson) behind S.B. 169 three years later.
  5. 5
    It passed committee 4-0-5 and was signed into law March 22, 2021, with essentially no public attention at the time.
Quick glossary — click a term
Public Infrastructure District
A special-purpose local entity that can issue bonds and levy taxes to pay for infrastructure. MIDA can create these as its own subsidiaries within its project areas.
Public-private partnership facilitator
A role that helps arrange deals between government entities and private developers. This bill let MIDA or a subsidiary serve in that role under a specific conflict-of-interest exception.
GRAMA
Utah's Government Records Access and Management Act — the state's public records law, which this bill created an exception to for MIDA in certain circumstances.

By 2021, MIDA had existed for fourteen years. This is the bill that quietly gave it the specific financial tool — a taxing PID subsidiary — that every subsequent MIDA-area tax finding in this investigation runs through, plus a set of exceptions to conflict-of-interest, open meetings, and public records law that got almost no attention at the time.

What The Bill Does

+

S.B. 233, "Military Installation Development Authority Amendments," 2021 General Session. Chief Sponsor Sen. Jerry W. Stevenson; House Sponsor Rep. Val L. Peterson. Tap a card for why each provision matters.

The Two-Step Sequence

+
  • 2019
    S.B. 228 (Daniel McCay, House Sponsor James A. Dunnigan) enacts the general statewide Public Infrastructure District Act — the foundational framework any local entity can use to create a PID.
  • 2020
    S.B. 179 (Daniel McCay again, not Stevenson) specifically allows MIDA to create a Public Infrastructure District as its own subsidiary — the step that made a MIDA-controlled PID possible at all.
  • 2021
    S.B. 233 (this bill, Stevenson) lets that MIDA-created PID levy property tax directly for operations and maintenance — turning the 2020 structural authorization into an actual taxing power.
  • Two different senators built this in two steps a year apart: McCay opened the door, Stevenson gave what walked through it the power to tax. Neither the 2019 nor 2020 predecessor bills appear to have drawn significant public attention at the time — both passed as fairly technical-sounding PID framework bills.

    Vote Record

    +
    4–0–5
    Senate Business & Labor Committee, favorable
    27–0
    Senate floor, Final Passage
    67–1–7
    House floor, Final Passage, Mar 5, 2021

    Passed the Senate Business and Labor Committee with a favorable recommendation, 4–0–5, February 26, 2021. Passed the Senate floor 27–0. Final Passage in the House, 3rd Reading, March 5, 2021 at 11:20 AM: 67 yeas, 1 nay, 7 absent or not voting. The lone House no vote was Rep. Petersen, M. (The House vote's own record header labels it a "Senate 3rd Reading," but le.utah.gov's own floor audio index confirms Day 45, March 5, 2021, as House Floor Audio with House Sponsor Val Peterson presenting — the header label is a tracking-system artifact.) Signed by the Governor March 22, 2021; effective the same day. Session Law Chapter 414.

    Which Projects Actually Use This

    +

    The taxing power this bill created isn't theoretical — at least two MIDA-created Public Infrastructure Districts are actively using it, with real budgets and bonds behind them.

    $274M
    Mountain Village PID tentative FY2026 budget (Deer Valley/Jordanelle)

    MIDA Mountain Village Public Infrastructure District — the PID covering the Deer Valley East Village/Jordanelle expansion. Its original Designation Resolution and Assessment Ordinance were adopted February 26, 2021 — the same day this bill cleared the Senate Business and Labor Committee. The district approved a $274 million tentative budget for fiscal year 2026 (May 13, 2025). It has since amended its assessment areas multiple times (2025 resolutions on Assessment Areas #1 and #2), and its board includes Kurt Krieg — an Extell employee — alongside MIDA officials Gary Harter, Nicole Cottle, and Mike Ostermiller.

    MIDA Mountain Veterans Program Public Infrastructure District — a separate PID that issued Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Series 2024) explicitly secured by, among other pledged revenue, "District Property Tax Revenues." The bond proceeds funded an inn, townhomes, a day lodge, and a maintenance structure — ski-resort infrastructure consistent with the Military Recreation Facility project area near Mayflower/Sundance.

    MIDA's own board has also indicated interest in developing nuclear power and AI data center capacity within its Utah National Guard project area (27 combined UTNG properties) — approving a $16.5 million loan for related work at Camp Williams, including a facility tied to uranium enrichment equipment manufacturing. Whether that project area's own PID has separately invoked the S.B. 233 property tax authority hasn't been confirmed here.

    Coverage — Then And Later

    +

    Despite expanding MIDA's taxing, public-infrastructure-district, and public-private-partnership powers — and creating exceptions involving meetings, records, and conflicts of interest — S.B. 233 received almost no substantive contemporaneous mainstream news coverage this Hive could locate. It passed the Senate 27–0 and the House 67–1 before Gov. Cox signed it. That's not "the media never covered it" — unindexed print, broadcast, or archived reporting may exist — but a search of major Utah outlets came up nearly empty. Worth remembering the bill passed in the middle of a still-active pandemic, when legislative coverage broadly thinned out statewide.

    The one mainstream mention found: a Fox 13 roundup of bills Gov. Cox signed that legislative session listed S.B. 233 as one item among dozens, with no explanation of its taxing, transparency, or public-private-partnership provisions.

    The most detailed contemporaneous discussion came from an advocacy source, not a newsroom: the Utah Conservation Community's February 28, 2021 legislative update opposed the bill, describing it as giving MIDA additional "power and secrecy." It specifically flagged the same four provisions documented on this page — the taxing-power change, the conflict-of-interest exception, and the open-meetings and records exceptions — plus a related $45.6 million budget allocation it said supported infrastructure tied to the military project and the resort. That characterization should be read as the organization's own advocacy framing, not a neutral account — but its description of the bill's actual provisions matches the enrolled legislation.

    Real scrutiny came later, and aimed at the broader pattern rather than this bill specifically. A December 2023 Salt Lake Tribune investigation, republished by KPCW, found Senate President Stuart Adams and Sen. Jerry Stevenson — MIDA's chair and vice chair — had together received roughly $112,500 in donations connected to Extell owner Gary Barnett since 2018, nearly three-quarters of it going to Adams directly or PACs he leads. Adams had already accepted almost $30,000 of that money by the time he and Barnett posed together at the Mayflower groundbreaking in June 2021 — three months after this bill passed. The same reporting found Stevenson had introduced a dozen bills tweaking MIDA statute across his 14 legislative sessions, changes he said made MIDA "tremendously effective": "I don't think we envisioned some of the things that have taken place... the laws governing MIDA had to be adjusted."

    MIDA's own executive director, Paul Morris, told lawmakers at a 2022 interim committee meeting that Extell "read the MIDA law and they said there's no way we can make that work without using the MIDA resources" — and Extell's own VP of development, Brooke Hontz, echoed it to the Tribune: Barnett "wouldn't even consider coming to Utah without the MIDA jurisdiction." Both Adams and Stevenson, when asked directly, denied the donations influenced their votes. Adams: "Campaign contributions do not impact nor influence any of my decisions or votes." Stevenson: "I don't know that the donation from the Barnetts has been any heavier than it has from other places... I don't think that influences my vote."

    Still Open

    +
    What isn't confirmed yet: the exact statutory text of the open meetings/GRAMA and conflict-of-interest exceptions hasn't been pulled and quoted directly — only the bill's own "Highlighted Provisions" summary, which is accurate but not the full legal language. Whether MIDA's Utah National Guard/Camp Williams project area has its own PID separately using this same property tax authority hasn't been confirmed. The exact contents of the Utah Conservation Community's cited $45.6 million budget allocation haven't been independently traced to a specific state budget line.